Techno Tories and Green Left Diverge Sharply over UK’s Future

£12 billion over ten years for Boris Johnson’s ‘Green Industrial Revolution’ is a drop in the ocean. Different minds, in the Transition Economics consultancy, want a huge amount more –£85 billion of public investment in the next TWO YEARS.

The All Party Parliamentary Group on the Green New Deal is more sympathetic to the latter figure, and quotes it in its new report How to Reset: policies to deliver on the public desire for a fairer, greener Britain after Covid

“The think-tank Transition Economics propose a two-year clean infrastructure stimulus which they calculate would replace the projected jobs lost from Covid and are designed to benefit the people and sectors hit hardest by its economic impacts. Using 10 World Bank-derived criteria including long-term job creation, resilience and sustainability, they recommend 19 infrastructure projects totalling an £85 billion public investment that would deliver structural transformation and create 1.2 million jobs over the next two years, comprising 735,000 jobs in housing construction and energy efficiency retrofits; 289,000 jobs in transport upgrades; 98,000 jobs in energy, waste, and manufacturing infrastructures; 81,000 jobs in land, forestry, and agriculture improvements; 42,000 jobs in broadband upgrades.”

Aircraft trails, all contributing to climate change. The Westminster Government is hoping for zero-emission planes, but they are not yet a commercial reality.

The All Party Parliamentary Group does not have the power to introduce such policies (a pity, speaking personally!) but makes strong arguments for them. Their ideas, apart from the infrastructure transformation, include Universal Basic Income; a jobs guarantee extending to “work that is socially useful, organised around community need” and paying at least a national living wage; creating a new National Nature Service to “employ and train thousands of people in environmental work”; and establishing another national service, for social care.

The group calls for reform of the planning system “to empower local authorities to develop 15-minute neighbourhoods designed to ensure that people’s needs for shops, entertainment, education, healthcare and green spaces can all be met within a short walk or cycle of their home”. This means a lot more green spaces!

A National Investment Bank, and significant re-allocation of current spending to help create a society with “a broader set of human and ecological health and wellbeing objectives” than GDP growth, are also among the group’s ambitions.

The Johnsonian Conservative vision of a Green Industrial Revolution focuses on technologies – current and still-to-be-invented – to achieve emissions reductions while still trying to ratchet up industrial growth. The All Party Parliamentary Group, responding to its surveys of public opinion, concentrates on equity, fairness, and restoration of damaged environments.

The group’s composition helps to explain the contrasting objectives. There are no Conservative MPs in the group of 22, and only two Conservatives in total, both peers. The Conservatives are outnumbered by Green Party (3) and Labour (12) politicians.

PDR


Grim Now, Grimmer Later: Time to Act

Official launch on Tuesday July 7th — ‘Solving the Grim Equation’, published by Cambria Books and written by me, Pat Dodd Racher

Upstairs at The Angel, Rhosmaen Street, Llandeilo, at 7.30pm.

Author and One Planet Council patron David Thorpe will lead a question and answer session and discussion.

The Grim Equation means that increased consumption now will result in lower consumption in the future.

Exciting pioneer projects in Wales show that families can reduce consumption dramatically and use less energy, and still live happily. Pioneers have had to battle against hostility in local government, but thanks to the Welsh Government’s ‘One Wales One Planet’ policy the chances of projects being approved are increasing.

The One Planet Development policy, and guidance in Technical Advice Note 6, and the establishment in Wales of the One Planet Council, can give Wales a leading role in the inevitable One Planet future — because we have only one planet on which to live.

xxxxx

The longer we wait, the more uncomfortable the fall


Green Diaspora Grows

Reckon it’s important that Greens of all hues work together for a cleaner, fairer, more sustainable world — and there are more shades of Green than one might think:

What Shade of Green is Best?

The variety of visible shades of Green suggests that concerns about environmental protection, wealth inequalities, bullying by big business, and climate change, are widely shared and are forcing their way up the political agenda — at last.

 


The Nobbling of Low Impact Development Pioneers

It’s all about the knowledge — some knowledge is valued by the Establishment, some knowledge is discounted as low status, of little import.

The knowledge required for successful low-impact development — knowledge about living far more self-sufficiently than it usual in profit-driven industrial societies — usually falls into the second category and is therefore not regarded by policy-makers or planners as legitimate.

See post on  https://westwalesnewsreview.wordpress.com/2014/07/05/low-impact-development-hampered-by-illegitimate-knowledge/


The Week’s Environmental News

The week’s round-up of environmental news reblogged from Under the Pecan Leaves:

http://mylandrestorationproject.wordpress.com/2014/06/20/environment-news-613-619/

 

 


Environmental News Worldwide Round-up

Helpful round-up of the week’s environmental news from around the world, from Debra on Under the Pecan Leaves:

http://mylandrestorationproject.wordpress.com/2014/05/23/environment-news-this-week-416-422/

News includes marches against Monsanto, two counties in Oregon ban GMOs, wildfires take hold in Arizona, waste water from fracking damages streams, radioactive water from Fukushima being released into the Pacific, and a lot more.

 


Living in a time of contraction: random notes from a corner of rural Wales

In the Co-op supermarket, people’s trollies containing fewer processed foods than hitherto. More vegetables, fruit, bread, less confectionery and cake. That’s what it looks like. Also signs of supply strains, good quality fresh produce shifts fast, and there isn’t enough for everyone.

Quiet roads outside commuting times. In the evening I can drive 10 miles back from nearest town without seeing another vehicle. We only drive when we have to.

Raising money for good causes. Less easy than it was, but then I am not very persuasive. Not much spare cash around.

Empty shops. Llandovery, several miles to the east, reflects the lack of local spending power. Even the pound shop has closed, the convenience store across the street, the seconds clothing shop near the (too expensive) car park, a good bakery and patisserie, HSBC bank, the local museum. The Post Office is scheduled to close. The closures have come at a time when people can afford to travel less, when subsidies are being pulled from bus services, when in our part of the world road maintenance spending is to be cut by a third.

Official policies continue to favour centralisation, but they are behind the curve of reality. Most politicians still seem to be living in the expectation of renewed economic growth which will pay for yet more centralisation.

However, we have already monetised previous voluntary, unpaid activities, such as care of the elderly and childcare, to boost Gross Domestic Product (GDP) figures. There is not much left to monetise, so it was no surprise that in the Budget last Wednesday the Chancellor freed pensioners to spend their funds just as they like, instead of having to buy an annuity, or enrol in a tightly regulated income drawdown plan, the situation until now. Some new pensioners will be cautious, no doubt, but there are bound to be others who are tempted to spend – and that spending will inflate GDP. But is it wise in the long term? What happens when the spendthrift retirees run out of money and are subsisting on the new universal pension of about £7,300 a year, at today’s prices? Will that level of state pension be affordable? Will it be allowed to diminish in real value, so that pensioners sink into real poverty?

Short-term thinking has got us into a real mess. We are entering the era of resource limits without a strategy for fair distribution, without even a strategy for informing people about the likely trajectories of decline.

But then, for those who have scrambled to the top of the crumbling pyramid, the fate of the people below them is not always an important priority.


‘What I Did in my Holidays’: scenarios in 2030

by Pat Dodd Racher

From the Welsh countryside

That popular teacher’s standby topic at the start of term, ‘What I Did in my Holidays’, supposes both that people have holidays and fit ‘activities’ into them. These suppositions are 20th century for the UK, if not for the emerging middle classes in China and elsewhere in Asia.

The news yesterday from the Institute of Fiscal Studies, that real wages (after allowing for inflation) in the UK fell faster between 2008 and 2013 than at any other time in modern history, tells us that most people have less money to spend on holidays. The squeeze is not going to end: for formerly affluent workers in the West, globalisation is a grinding process of levelling down.

In austerity-heavy Greece, the unemployed and/or unpaid are going back, if they can, to the small farms that their parents or grandparents left, when cities were a more enticing prospect. Barter has re-emerged as an important aspect of the economy. In this world, holidays cease to become consumer purchases and are special days punctuating the working calendar.

‘Tourism’ in Wales will change dramatically, too. The short-break market, on which much of scenic rural Wales has a heavy reliance, will shrink. Problem is, policy-makers still expect growth, and even among the post-war babies with their private pensions, calls on their resources to help children buy houses and grandchildren to buy university courses, mean that overall they have less to spend on themselves.

What is the point, then, of encouraging more hotels and guesthouses to open in quiet market towns, rather than developing policies to counteract the perverse impacts of globalisation, by supporting local production for local consumption, production of energy, food, artisan manufactures, remodelling and repairs. Current rules mean that subsidies for local production have to be given voluntarily, by individuals and social enterprises, because the corporation-dominated World Trade Organisation insists on ‘free (unsubsidised) markets’ (except for the manufacture of arms and other ‘essentials’ for the security of the corporate state).

Back to ‘What I Did in my Holidays’. Suppose that in the year 2030, as a decidedly elderly person, I went to Llandovery to stay with my granddaughter.

Scenario 1: The slow train from Swansea clattered over a poorly maintained track, but the embankments were not dangerously overgrown because work parties from the local prison kept them clear. In Llandovery it was market day when I arrived, much of the merchandise transported in electric trucks, some by horse and cart. The high cost of imported foods had persuaded the Welsh government, now in the North West Europe Federation, to prioritise allotments and orchards for communities to grow their own food.  The Georgian houses around the Market Square accommodated small shops and workshops. My granddaughter worked in the rural university, which occupied the former premises of Pantycelyn High School (closed 2015) and Llandovery College, which became the nucleus of the new university. I heard lots of Welsh spoken as I wandered around, and some Dutch and Norwegian, but the speakers were attached to the university, not tourists.

Scenario 2: Long and bumpy journey by cart from the rail terminus in Swansea, because the Heart of Wales line had been abandoned in 2020. The roads, damaged by frequent floods and winter icing, discouraged travel. Llandovery was down-at-heel because few residents could afford building materials or paint, which was in short supply anyway. No school now, and certainly no university, so this was a village of the old, like the little communities I remembered from the Adriatic islands of Yugoslavia-that-was in the 1960s, where donkeys were beasts of burden and their owners, dressed in black, toiled alone in the fields. Rural Wales had suffered badly in the Siberian flu epidemic of 2022, and farmers struggled from season to season in the unpredictable and often stormy weather. Llandovery was such a backwater that the little community was largely left to its own devices. My granddaughter was the district nurse, the only one in the whole of North East Carmarthenshire, with a crushingly heavy workload. Her employer, the Central Wales Health Board, owed her five months’ wages.

And I was the only tourist in sight.


Politics sets out to reclaim the people!

Why are people so suspicious of politics? Not only politicians, but politics too. Political debate is at the heart of democracy. Even our limited democracy, for most confined to an occasional vote, is better than none at all – that way lies the resurgence of slavery and totalitarianism, which are both evident in more of the world than we may imagine.

The idea of politics as a fundamental element of our society has to become strongly rooted again, and this is why Plaid Cymru had a stall at Llandovery’s busy Sheep Festival last weekend (Saturday and Sunday September 29 and 30, 2012). Over the two days of this popular festival in east Carmarthenshire, hundreds of people made circuits of the stands in the big striped marquee, in what was just as much a social as a commercial occasion – bumping into friends and neighbours, exchanging news. Our stand was between two enticing ones, selling hand-made wool-topped footstools and woollen clothing hand-spun from sheep with fleeces of many shades.

Lots of passers-by looked at our stand, and on the Saturday – fine and sunny – several children were attracted to the sheep-and-farmyard colouring competition. It was different on Sunday, when the rain was horizontal, the wind tore at the sides of the tent, and the temperature was many degrees lower. Most of the smaller children, swathed in waterproof clothing, looked as though they would rather be at home. The adults seemed readier, on the whole, to talk about the aims of the Transition Town movement than about Plaid’s policies (we had Transition Town Llandeilo information sheets on the stand). Is this because Transition Towns are seen as non-political?

The Green agendas of Transition Towns and Plaid Cymru overlap. For both, sustainability into a resource-poor, climate-challenged future is a top priority. Transition Town members work up small-scale practical solutions such as new allotments, community orchards, local currencies, barter systems, and volunteer-led enterprises like village shops that could not survive if left to face supermarket competition on their own.

The World Wildlife Fund’s Living Planet Report 2012 tells us (p.44) that “If everyone lived like an average resident of the USA, a total of four earths would be required to regenerate humanity’s annual demand on nature”. The UK is not quite as profligate, but is still depleting our planet two and a half times faster than it can regenerate, an overshoot that led the Welsh Assembly Government to release One Wales One Planet in 2009, representing “Our new vision of a sustainable Wales, based on using only our fair share of the earth’s resources.”

Even worse now: this graphic from the World Wildlife Fund, using 2003 data, hints at the scale of  our over-exploitation of Earth. The USA is using up our planet’s resources four times faster than they can be regenerated, the UK two-and-a-half times. Since 2003 countries then further down the over-use scale, such as Brazil, China and Thailand, have become much more exploitative.

As yet unspoken is the detail of how we attain this necessary objective. Many of the people who came to the Sheep Festival were ready to do their bit, by growing their vegetables, recycling more, cutting back on fossil fuel use, but there is still a gap between these individual efforts and the national good intentions.

Different parties, different gaps: Labour at their annual conference this week appear to have ditched green policy in favour of spend, spend, spend and build, build, build. The Conservatives can be green-tongued but their tongues are somewhat severed from their Gradgrind policies. LibDems cast some green splodges on Conservative agendas, but softening the hard Tory edges has become their defining feature, rather than distinctive ideas of their own. That’s how it seems from where I sit, at least.  No wonder why so many of us look on politics as a disreputable game of trading insults – but as Winston Churchill said, “Democracy is the worst form of government, except for all those other forms that have been tried from time to time” (House of Commons, November 11 1947).

If we don’t plan a rapid reduction in our consumption of resources that are not renewable, the alternative is likely to be a much more uncomfortable rationing by ability to pay, or even by ability to defend your local resources from raiding by others, in ferocious Viking fashion perhaps. We can’t create a radically different, more sustainable society without participating in political discussion and planning. So thank you, Sheep Festival, for the opportunity to be there, and here’s to next year’s event!


Death-Dealing Drones and a Dog Called Waldo

We are living in a planet-sized electronic war game. Those early Space Invaders have a lot to answer for. “Just harmless fun”, we may have thought while indulging in make-believe slaughter. But now we are all potential targets of Drone vehicles.

Drone aircraft, especially, make killing missions easy and ‘safe’ for their controllers. These Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs) are still too expensive to be used routinely against nuisance civilians – a nuisance to the powers-that-be, that is – but the frequency with which the US military uses drones to kill ‘targets’ in remote regions is chilling, all the more so because President Obama apparently regards the whole world as a legitimate killing field for the individual assassination targets that he approves. Drones give their possessors global reach.

The military seems able to depersonalise all the victims, as if they were no more than digital dots without a real existence. The US Air Force website had a story back in 2006 about the “hunter-killer role” of the MQ-9 drone, called the Reaper, which drops 500lb bombs and Hellfire missiles.[1] Wide-area surveillance systems are also carried by drones, video systems that watch whole cities, wide landscapes, areas where ‘hostiles’ might be located. The US Air Force has a surveillance system called Gorgon Stare[2], which brings a whole new and terrifying meaning to Big Brother.

No wonder the US and UK are ‘withdrawing’ from Afghanistan, because their arsenals of drones can be controlled from back home, by the CIA as well as the armed services. Drones are being adopted by other arms of government, so that any location can be scrutinized in real time.[3]

There doesn’t seem to have been much public debate about the uses of drones, although they have taken armed conflict to a new and even more alarming level, allowing a very few controllers to dominate everyone else. That means it will be easy for anyone in power to decapitate dissent. Not a world I want to live in.  Not ecological at all, as healthy ecosystems tend to be diverse and flexible enough to change. The only consolation is that attempts to impose permanent dominance always fail, often because of events that were not predicted. The most ferocious dinosaurs probably didn’t worry too much about eating everything in sight, but in the end they ran out of food.

Drones conquer distance and negate the human worth of military ‘targets’, and it seems strange that in this world of making God-like decisions without any apparent comeback on yourself as controller, a dog can be given a memorial service while zapped targets are left on the ground where they died. I read about a service in Charlston, South Carolina, for a military dog, Waldo, which died, not in active service but of illness at 11 years old.[4]


[1] www.af.mil/news/story.asp?storyID=123027012, September 14 2006.

[2] www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2011/01/01/AR2011010102690.html January 2 2011.

[3] See http://www.smithsonianmag.com/science-nature/Drones-are-Ready-for-Takeoff.html June 2011.

[4] http://www.af.mil/news/story.asp?id=123305264 June 8 2012.